AI Strategy Index

Goldman Sachs AI Strategy: An Operating Model Rebuilt Around AI

How Goldman Sachs approaches AI: OneGS 3.0, six AI workstreams, the GS AI Assistant, its workforce stance and what it measures. Updated November 2026.

Company
Goldman Sachs
Industry
Banking & financial services
Headquarters
New York, United States
Region
US
AI strategy
Part of corporate strategy
Index group
S&P 100

Global investment bank and asset and wealth manager

Where the AI strategy is set out

OneGS 3.0, an operating model propelled by AI, is set out in the fourth-quarter 2025 earnings presentation (January 2026). No standalone AI strategy.

Read the company source

Where Goldman Sachs Is Going with AI

Goldman Sachs frames its AI strategy as a new operating model, called OneGS 3.0. It names six workstreams where AI will change how the firm runs, from client onboarding to regulatory reporting. A year after launch, the firm has not published results for any of them.

The ambition is a new operating model. Goldman’s fourth-quarter 2025 earnings presentation describes OneGS 3.0 as a new operating model propelled by artificial intelligence.

The goals are broad. The same presentation lists six of them: enhancing the client experience, driving productivity and efficiency, improving profitability, strengthening resilience and capacity to scale, bolstering risk management and elevating the employee experience.

The focus is six named workstreams. OneGS 3.0 starts with client onboarding and KYC, enterprise risk management, vendor management, lending, regulatory reporting and sales enablement.

Supporting aims on the same slide include automating error-prone workflows and optimizing headcount.

The industry view is pragmatic. The firm’s 2025 Annual Report says that every new technology creates winners and losers. It also says heavier investment in AI requires diligent risk management.

Outside benchmarks place it outside the top ten. The Evident AI Index ranked Goldman Sachs 12th of 50 banks in October 2026, down from 9th a year earlier.

Goldman Sachs has not said publicly what it will not prioritize.

What It Takes: Platform, Partners and People

The platform is built in-house. The GS AI Assistant became available across the firm in June 2025. It had first been piloted for more than a year with more than 10,000 employees, according to an internal memo from CIO Marco Argenti reported by Fortune.

The next step is agents built with Anthropic. In February 2026, Argenti said Anthropic engineers had been embedded with Goldman teams for about six months. They were building agents for work such as accounting, compliance checks and client onboarding.

The agents were in early testing, and the firm had not set a deployment date or shared performance numbers, as reported by AI News.

The workforce stance is cautious. In an October 2025 memo, CEO David Solomon, President John Waldron and CFO Denis Coleman said the firm would constrain headcount growth through the end of the year, with a limited reduction in roles, according to Fortune.

A spokesperson said headcount would still rise over 2025. The firm’s 2025 Form 10-K reports a headcount of 47,400 at year end. Argenti has said the agent work is not about replacing people, at least at this stage.

Measurement is by team, not by person. In a May 2026 Fortune interview, Argenti said tracking individual AI use is not useful. He measures how quickly a team can build a feature instead. He oversees about 12,000 engineers, and has argued that firms need to teach AI their company culture, a point covered in What Real AI Leadership Looks Like.

Ownership sits at the top. The firm’s three most senior executives sponsor OneGS 3.0, and Argenti leads the AI platform and the agent work. No AI-specific investment figure has been disclosed.

AI risk has its own committee. Goldman’s 2026 quarterly filings name a Firmwide Artificial Intelligence Risk Committee, co-chaired by the CIO and the chief risk officer. The annual report ties AI investment to diligent risk management. Published responsible AI principles were not found in the sources reviewed.

AI fluency, coded against the Lead with AI Fluency Matrix (September 2026 edition):

  • Fluency floor: None declared. The firm aims to accelerate AI adoption across its workforce, but has not set a usage or skills standard.
  • Highest level evidenced: Nothing above adoption. The agents are in testing, and no workflow with a published result was found.
  • Portfolio design: Not disclosed. The firm measures team speed rather than individual use.

How Goldman Sachs Measures Results

No outcomes have been published. The earnings presentation sets goals for OneGS 3.0 but gives no quantified targets. The sources reviewed contain no AI savings or productivity figures.

Adoption is the clearest number. By September 2026, about 40,000 of the firm’s roughly 46,000 employees used the GS AI Assistant every week, according to TIME.

The stated measure is team speed. Argenti tracks how quickly a team can develop a feature, which shows up as a shrinking work backlog.

The roadmap is described as multiyear. The October 2025 memo called the change a multiyear effort, without dated milestones.

Change log

  • June 2025: The GS AI Assistant becomes available firm-wide after a pilot with more than 10,000 employees.
  • October 2025: The OneGS 3.0 memo constrains headcount growth and plans limited role cuts.
  • January 2026: Six initial workstreams are published with full-year results.
  • February 2026: Agent work with Anthropic is disclosed.
  • May 2026: The CIO says the firm measures team speed rather than individual AI use.
  • October 2026: Evident ranks the firm 12th, down from 9th.

The Bottom Line

  • Disclosure: 3 of 4. Goldman Sachs answers where it is going, where it will focus and much of what it will take. It has not published how it will know AI is working.
  • The focus is specific. Six named workstreams make OneGS 3.0 one of the more concrete AI strategies a bank has published.
  • The workforce stance is restrained. The firm slowed hiring and planned limited cuts, while headcount still rose in 2025.
  • The say-do gap is in results. A year after launch, no outcome for any workstream or agent has been published.
  • Watch the agents. The Anthropic-built agents are the first real test of whether OneGS 3.0 changes how work gets done.

Revenue, Headcount and Revenue per Employee

What the numbers show: Revenue grew 23% since 2022 with 2% fewer people, putting revenue per employee above $1.2 million. Goldman has not tied any of that gain to AI.

Revenue, headcount and revenue per employee, FY2022 to FY2025

  • FY2022: $47.37bn revenue, 48,500 employees, $977k per employee
  • FY2023: $46.25bn revenue, 45,300 employees, $1.02M per employee
  • FY2024: $53.51bn revenue, 46,500 employees, $1.15M per employee
  • FY2025: $58.28bn revenue, 47,400 employees, $1.23M per employee

Change, FY2022 to FY2025: revenue up 23%, headcount down 2%, revenue per employee up 26%.

Notes: Revenue is net revenues, as reported. Headcount is at year-end.

These figures give context on scale and productivity. They do not show that AI caused any change. Sources: Goldman Sachs 10-K filings and Q4 2025 earnings release.

How Goldman Sachs Compares with Financial Services Peers

We looked at how Goldman Sachs compares with other financial services companies in the index. Here is how they stack up.

CompanyDisclosureAI ownerFluency floorGovernanceAI value reportedRevenue per employee
Allianz3 of 4No named AI owner; board COO covers ITLevel 1, by participationEight principles and a register of every use caseResults by use case, no total$1.35M
Bank of America4 of 4CTIO; no Chief AI OfficerNot disclosedControls, no published principlesYes: $250M to $300M in 2026, with a 2027 figure$531k
BBVA4 of 4AI Transformation area at the top of the bankLevel 1, training required before accessEight published principlesResults by process and agent$328k
Goldman Sachs3 of 4CIO, sponsored by the top three executivesNone declaredFirmwide AI risk committeeNo: weekly use only$1.23M
JPMorgan Chase4 of 4Chief Data and Analytics Officer, passing to the CTONone declared (use is opt-in)Little publishedEarlier savings estimate, no longer updated$573k
Klarna3 of 4CEONot disclosedNone publishedYes: savings and work done by AI$1.24M
Lloyds Banking Group4 of 4Chief Data and AI OfficerLevel 1, mandatory trainingResponsible AI team and frameworkYes: about £50M in 2025, £100M+ target$377k

Disclosure counts how many of the four strategy questions (where it is going, where it will focus, what it will take and how it will know it is working) a company answers in public. Fluency floor is the lowest level of AI fluency a company expects of all its people, on the five levels of the Lead with AI Fluency Matrix: Avoiding (0), Chatting (1), Collaborating (2), Integrating (3) and Transforming (4). The other columns summarize each company’s profile. Revenue per employee is for each company’s latest fiscal year, in US dollars. See all companies in the AI Strategy Index.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Goldman Sachs’ AI strategy?

Goldman Sachs’ AI strategy is OneGS 3.0, a new operating model that the firm describes as propelled by artificial intelligence. It starts with six workstreams: client onboarding and KYC, enterprise risk management, vendor management, lending, regulatory reporting and sales enablement.

‍

Does Goldman Sachs use AI agents?

Yes, in testing. In February 2026, the firm said it was building agents with Anthropic for work such as accounting, compliance checks and client onboarding. It had not set a deployment date or published results.

‍

Is Goldman Sachs cutting jobs because of AI?

Only on a limited scale so far. In October 2025, the firm said it would constrain headcount growth and make a limited reduction in roles, but headcount still rose over 2025 to 47,400. Its CIO has said the agent work is not about replacing people at this stage.

‍

How does Goldman Sachs measure AI?

The firm has not published AI outcomes. Its CIO measures how quickly teams build features, rather than tracking individual AI use.

‍

How is this profile put together?

Lead with AI profiles use public sources only, such as annual reports, earnings materials, filings and on-record interviews, dated at the time of writing. AI fluency is coded against the Lead with AI Fluency Matrix. Company figures are marked as company-claimed unless they have been independently verified.

About the AI Strategy Index

The Lead with AI AI Strategy Index profiles how the largest companies in the US and Europe approach AI, starting with the S&P 100 and the STOXX Europe 50. Each profile answers four questions: where the company is going with AI, where it will focus, what it will take and how it will know it is working. Profiles use public sources only, and AI fluency is coded against the Lead with AI Fluency Matrix.

See all company profiles